{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"UHY Fay &amp; Co","provider_url":"https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/en\/","author_name":"admin_uhyfay25","author_url":"https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/en\/author\/admin_uhyfay25\/","title":"Resolution of the plenary session of the constitutional court - UHY Fay &amp; Co","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"frGrJxn3sN\"><a href=\"https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/en\/resolution-question-unconstitutionality\/\">Resolution of the plenary session of the constitutional court<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/en\/resolution-question-unconstitutionality\/embed\/#?secret=frGrJxn3sN\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Resolution of the plenary session of the constitutional court&#8221; &#8212; UHY Fay &amp; Co\" data-secret=\"frGrJxn3sN\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script>\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/uhyfay25.solbyte.dev\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/cuestion_de_inconstitucionalidad-1-2.jpg","thumbnail_width":900,"thumbnail_height":600,"description":"The Constitutional Court, in its entirety, has unanimously resolved the question of unconstitutionality raised by the Administrative Litigation Chamber of the National Court regarding various modifications introduced in the Corporate Income Tax (CIT) by Royal Decree-Law 3\/2016, dated December 2nd. This Royal Decree-Law aimed to implement measures in the tax field to consolidate public finances,..."}